Korean Journal of Breeding Science :eISSN 2287-5174 / pISSN 0250-3360

Table. 8.

The result of regional yield trials carried out at 12 locations from 2011 to 2013.

Location Yield (ton ha-1)

Saegeum Daewonkong


2011 2012 2013 Mean Indexz 2011 2012 2013 Mean
Suwon 2.36 2.12 3.04 2.51 103 2.01 2.17 3.10 2.43
Yeoncheon 2.60 2.03 2.69 2.44 95 2.83 1.98 2.89 2.57
Chuncheon 2.43 2.83 3.60 2.95 97 2.87 2.92 3.34 3.04
Yesan 2.66 1.59 2.22 2.16 112 2.53 1.61 1.64 1.93
Cheongwon 2.63 2.25 2.91 2.60 97 2.37 2.27 3.37 2.67
Dalseong - - 3.38 3.38 108 - - 3.13 3.13
Milyang 2.87 3.12 - 2.99 101 2.68 3.26 - 2.97
Iksan 2.48 2.12 3.42 2.67 104 2.40 2.63 2.69 2.57
Naju 2.40 2.41 4.72 3.18 102 2.26 2.36 4.69 3.10
Chilgok 3.80 2.97 3.52 3.43 99 3.27 3.40 3.67 3.45
Jinju 3.05 2.51 2.53 2.70 94 2.60 2.90 3.13 2.88
Jeju 2.01 1.41 1.60 1.67 77 2.14 1.51 2.91 2.19

Adaptable meany 2.92 2.62 3.51 3.02 101 2.64 2.91 3.46 3.01

Overall mean 2.66 2.30 3.06 2.72 99 2.54 2.46 3.14 2.71

t-valuex 0.06ns

zMean yield of ‘Saegeum’ / mean yield of ‘Daewonkong’×100

yMean yield in ‘Dalseong’, ‘Milyang’, ‘Iksan’, ‘Naju’, ‘Chilgok’, and ‘Jinju’.

x‘ns’ is not significantly different between ‘Saegeum’ and ‘Daewonkong’ at 0.05 level of probability by student t-test.

Korean J Breed Sci 2019;51:496-503 https://doi.org/10.9787/KJBS.2019.51.4.496
© 2019 Korean J Breed Sci