Korean Journal of Breeding Science :eISSN 2287-5174 / pISSN 0250-3360

Table. 8.

Yield of ‘Jangpung’ on the regional yield trials carried out at 11 locations.

Location Jangpung Daewonkong


2019 2020 2021 Mean Indexz 2019 2020 2021 Mean
Suwon 3.00 3.16 3.64 3.27 90 3.49 3.43 3.97 3.63
Yeoncheon 2.54 1.80 3.92 2.75 87 2.84 1.79 4.87 3.17
Chuncheon 3.05 2.58 2.89 2.84 89 3.23 2.86 3.44 3.18
Naju 3.44 3.00 3.18 3.21 105 3.49 3.05 2.62 3.05
Dalseong 3.31 3.19 4.00 3.50 111 2.64 3.25 3.61 3.17

Iksan 3.23 3.03 3.17 3.14 102 2.99 2.85 3.43 3.09
Jinju 2.64 2.34 1.66y 2.49 79 3.63 2.69 3.03 3.16
Cheongwon 4.05 2.61 2.76 3.14 107 2.94 2.79 3.05 2.93
Chilgok 2.51 2.99 3.20 2.90 94 2.89 3.20 3.19 3.09
Jeju 1.16 1.02 -x 1.09 78 1.67 1.14 - 1.40

Mean 2.75 2.58 3.52 2.90 99 2.76 2.71 3.47 2.94
Adaptable meanw 3.34 3.01 3.18 3.17 103 3.24 2.95 3.03 3.07
Overall mean 2.78 2.57 3.51 2.92 96 2.88 2.71 3.68 3.05
t-valuev -0.7ns

z(Index) Mean yield of Jangpung / mean yield of Daewonkong×100.

yMaturation delayed by insect damage.

xJeju was excluded for yield trial.

wAdaptable regions were Jeollabuk-do(Iksan) and Jeollanam-do(Naju) considering paddy field soybean production

v‘ns’ means non-significant between Jangpung and Daewonkong at 0.05 probability by student t-test.

Korean J. Breed. Sci. 2024;56:547-58 https://doi.org/10.9787/KJBS.2024.56.4.547
© 2024 Korean J. Breed. Sci.