Skip to main navigation Skip to main content

Korean. J. Breed. Sci. : Korean Journal of Breeding Science

OPEN ACCESS
ABOUT
BROWSE ARTICLES
EDITORIAL POLICIES
FOR CONTRIBUTORS

Articles

Article

기계수확 적응 소립 나물용 콩 ‘해품’

김현태1, 고종민1, 한원영1, 백인열1, 윤홍태1, 이영훈1, 이병원1, 하태정1, 정찬식1, 신상욱1, 김홍식1, 박장환1, 서정현1, 강범규1,*, 양우삼2, 곽도연1

Adaptation of Mechanized Harvest and Small Seed Soybean Cultivar ‘Haepum’ for Soy Sprouts

Korean Journal of Breeding Science 2018;50(3):249-255.
Published online: August 31, 2018

농촌진흥청 국립식량과학원

제주도농업기술원

National Institute of Crop Science (NICS), RDA, Jeonju, 55365, Korea

Jeju Agricultural Research & Extension Service, Jeju 63556, Korea

(E-mail: hellobk01@korea.kr, Tel: +82-55-350-1233, Fax: +82-55-353-3050)
• Received: March 30, 2018   • Accepted: July 9, 2018

Copyright: © 2018 by the Korean Society of Breeding Science

This is an Open-Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

  • 195 Views
  • 0 Download
  • 1 Crossref
prev next

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  Crossref logo
  • Lodging-Tolerant, High Yield, Mechanized-Harvest Adaptable and Small Seed Soybean Cultivar ‘Aram’ for Soy-sprout
    Beom Kyu Kang, Hyun Tae Kim, Jong Min Ko, Hong Tai Yun, Young Hoon Lee, Jeong Hyun Seo, Chan Sik Jung, Sang Ouk Shin, Eun Yeong Oh, Hong Sik Kim, In Seok Oh, In Youl Baek, Jae Hyun Oh, Min Jeong Seo, Woo Sam Yang, Dong Kwan Kim, Do Yeon Gwak
    Korean Journal of Breeding Science.2019; 51(3): 214.     CrossRef

Download Citation

Download a citation file in RIS format that can be imported by all major citation management software, including EndNote, ProCite, RefWorks, and Reference Manager.

Format:

Include:

Adaptation of Mechanized Harvest and Small Seed Soybean Cultivar ‘Haepum’ for Soy Sprouts
Korean. J. Breed. Sci.. 2018;50(3):249-255.   Published online September 1, 2018
Download Citation

Download a citation file in RIS format that can be imported by all major citation management software, including EndNote, ProCite, RefWorks, and Reference Manager.

Format:
Include:
Adaptation of Mechanized Harvest and Small Seed Soybean Cultivar ‘Haepum’ for Soy Sprouts
Korean. J. Breed. Sci.. 2018;50(3):249-255.   Published online September 1, 2018
Close

Figure

  • 0
  • 1
Adaptation of Mechanized Harvest and Small Seed Soybean Cultivar ‘Haepum’ for Soy Sprouts
Image Image
Fig. 1 Genealogy of ‘Haepum’
Fig. 2 Pedigree diagram of ‘Haepum’, zPreliminary yield trial, yAdvanced yield trial, xRegional yield trial.
Adaptation of Mechanized Harvest and Small Seed Soybean Cultivar ‘Haepum’ for Soy Sprouts

Qualitative characteristics of ‘Haepum’

Cultivar Growth habit Leaflet shape Flower color Pubescence Color Pod Color Seed coat color Hilum color Seed shape
Haepum Determinate Oval White Gray Yellow Yellow Light brown Spherical
Pungsannamulkong Determinate Lanceolate Purple Gray Yellow Yellow Yellow Spherical

Quantitative characteristics of ‘Haepum’ determined by regional yield trial from 2010 to 2012

Cultivar Flowering Date (Month, Day) Maturity Date (Month. Day) Plant Height (cm) First Pod Height (cm) No. of nods No. of branches No. of pods 100-seed weight (g) Lodging at field (1-9)z Shattering

Normal culture Density culture Field (1-9)y Ratio by Oven test(%)
Haepum 7.29 10. 6 61 15 14 3.1 68 10.4 1 3 1 0
Pungsannamulkong 7.30 10.11 55 9 14 4.0 69 12.0 6 8 1 46

t-valuey - - 1.40ns 2.24ns -0.59ns -2.25ns -0.38ns -2.50* - - - -

z(1)Tolerant ~ (9)Susceptible,

y(1)No shattering ~ (9)Easy to shattering

y(ns)non-significant; * was significantly different between Haepum and Pungsannamulkong at 0.05 by student t-test.

The resistance of ‘Haepum’ to the diseases of soybean estimated from 2010 to 2012

Cultivar Bacterial Pustule (0-9)z Root rot (%)y Soybean Mosaic Virusx Percentages of damaged seed (%)y



Field Inoculation Inoculation Field(0-9)z Purple seed stain Seed mottling Phomopsis seed decay Pod borer damage

G5 G6H G7H
Haepum 1 1 2.9 - / - L / - - / - 0 0.4 0.2 0.3 0.8
Pungsannamulkong 1 3 2.1 - / - - / - L / M 0 0.2 0.4 0.3 0.8

z(0)Tolerant~(9)Susceptible

yRoot rot and damaged seed that were naturally infected in the field were estimated

xReaction of inoculated leaf/upper leaves, (-)No symptom, (L)Local reaction, (M)Mosaic

Major component of seed in ‘Haepum’ estimated from 2010 to 2012

Cultivar Crude Protein (%) Crude Oil (%) Fatty acids (%) Isoflavone (μg/g)


Saturated Unsaturated Daidzein Glycitein Genistein Total
Haepum 38.4 17.0 14.2 85.8 1,019 395 1,449 2,863
Pungsannamulkong 39.8 17.4 14.3 85.7 646 239 942 1,827

t-valuez -1.83ns -0.46ns 0.05ns 0.05ns 1.35ns 2.40ns 1.34ns 1.52ns

zns is not significantly different between Haepum and Pungsannamulkong at 0.05 by student t-test.

Characteristics of soybean sprout of ‘Haepum’ estimated from 2010 to 2012

Cultivar 2-day Germination Rate(%) 5-day Germination Rate(%) Whole length(cm) Hypocotyl length(cm) Root length(cm) Hypocotyl thickness(mm) Hard seed rate(%) Decayed seed rate(%) Soy-sprout yield(%)
Haepum 99 99 20.6 9.7 10.9 2.1 0.0 0.0 453
Pungsannamulkong 95 95 18.8 10.4 8.4 2.3 4.4 5.0 410

t-valuez 3.16ns 3.16ns 1.37ns -2.34ns 2.34ns -3.0ns -1.0ns -1.0ns 0.78ns

zns is not significantly different between Haepum and Pungsannamulkong at 0.05 by student t-test

Yield of ‘Haepum’ on yield trials carried out at Milyang

Cultivar Yield (Ton/ha) Indexx

PYT(’08)z AYT(’09)y Mean
Haepum 325 454 390 126
Pungsannamulkong 248 369 309 100

z(PYT)Preliminary yield trial,

y(AYT)Advanced yield trial,

x(Index)Mean yield of cultivar/mean yield of Pungsannamulkong × 100

Yield of ‘Haepum’ on the regional yield trials carried out at 4 locations

Location Haepum Pungsannamulkong

2010 2011 2012 Mean Indexz 2010 2011 2012 Mean
Suwon 280 283 260 274 104 281 295 215 264
Miryang 336 386 321 348 117 319 295 279 298
Naju 251 324 289 288 108 251 285 261 266
Jeju 258 244 - 251 101 263 232 - 248

Overall mean 281 309 290 294 109 279 277 252 271

t-valuey - - - 2.45* - - - - -

z(Index) Mean yield of Haepum / mean yield of Pungsannamulkong × 100

y *was significantly different between Haepum and Pungsannamulkong at 0.05 by student t-test.

Table 1 Qualitative characteristics of ‘Haepum’
Table 2 Quantitative characteristics of ‘Haepum’ determined by regional yield trial from 2010 to 2012

(1)Tolerant ~ (9)Susceptible,

(1)No shattering ~ (9)Easy to shattering

(ns)non-significant; * was significantly different between Haepum and Pungsannamulkong at 0.05 by student t-test.

Table 3 The resistance of ‘Haepum’ to the diseases of soybean estimated from 2010 to 2012

(0)Tolerant~(9)Susceptible

Root rot and damaged seed that were naturally infected in the field were estimated

Reaction of inoculated leaf/upper leaves, (-)No symptom, (L)Local reaction, (M)Mosaic

Table 4 Major component of seed in ‘Haepum’ estimated from 2010 to 2012

ns is not significantly different between Haepum and Pungsannamulkong at 0.05 by student t-test.

Table 5 Characteristics of soybean sprout of ‘Haepum’ estimated from 2010 to 2012

ns is not significantly different between Haepum and Pungsannamulkong at 0.05 by student t-test

Table 6 Yield of ‘Haepum’ on yield trials carried out at Milyang

(PYT)Preliminary yield trial,

(AYT)Advanced yield trial,

(Index)Mean yield of cultivar/mean yield of Pungsannamulkong × 100

Table 7 Yield of ‘Haepum’ on the regional yield trials carried out at 4 locations

(Index) Mean yield of Haepum / mean yield of Pungsannamulkong × 100

was significantly different between Haepum and Pungsannamulkong at 0.05 by student t-test.