Skip to main navigation Skip to main content

Korean. J. Breed. Sci. : Korean Journal of Breeding Science

OPEN ACCESS
ABOUT
BROWSE ARTICLES
EDITORIAL POLICIES
FOR CONTRIBUTORS

Articles

Article

내도복 다수성 기계수확 적응 소립 나물용 콩 ‘아람’

강범규1,*, 김현태1, 고종민2, 윤홍태3, 이영훈4, 서정현1, 정찬식4, 신상욱1, 오은영1, 김홍식1, 오인석3, 백인열1, 오재현1, 서민정3, 양우삼5, 김동관6, 곽도연1

Lodging-Tolerant, High Yield, Mechanized-Harvest Adaptable and Small Seed Soybean Cultivar ‘Aram’ for Soy-sprout

Korean Journal of Breeding Science 2019;51(3):214-221.
Published online: September 1, 2019

농촌진흥청 국립식량과학원 남부작물부 밭작물개발과

농촌진흥청 국립식량과학원 남부작물부 논이용작물과

농촌진흥청 국립식량과학원 중부작물부 중부작물과

농촌진흥청 국립식량과학원 기획조정과

제주특별자치도농업기술원

전라남도농업기술원

Upland Crop Breeding Research Division, Department of Southern Area Crop Science, National Institute of Crop Science (NICS), RDA, Miryang, 50424, Republic of Korea

Paddy Crop Research Division, Department of Southern Area Crop Science, National Institute of Crop Science (NICS), RDA, Miryang, 50424, Republic of Korea

Central Area Crop Breeding Research Division, Department of Central Area Crop Science, National Institute of Crop Science (NICS), RDA, Suwon, 16429, Republic of Korea

Planning and Coordination Division, National Institute of Crop Science (NICS), RDA, Jeonju, 55365, Republic of Korea

Jeju Agricultural Research & Extension Service, Jeju, 63556, Korea,

Jeollanam-do Agricultural Research & Extension Service, Naju, 58213, Republic of Korea

*(E-mail: hellobk01@korea.kr, Tel: +82-55-350-1233, Fax: +82-55-355-3050)
• Received: June 1, 2019   • Revised: July 16, 2019   • Accepted: July 31, 2019

Copyright: © 2019 by the Korean Society of Breeding Science

This is an Open-Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

  • 131 Views
  • 0 Download
  • 2 Crossref
prev next

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  Crossref logo
  • A Mungbean (Vigna radiata L.) Variety ‘Chaeheun’ Adapted to Mechanical Harvesting and Showing Excellent Sprout Yield
    Ji Ho Chu, Joo-Sung Im, Byung-Won Lee, YoungKwang Ju
    Korean Journal of Breeding Science.2026; 58(2): 189.     CrossRef
  • Metabolomics reveals distinct metabolic alterations in the seeds of five soybean cultivars and the source–sink relationship
    Young Jin Park, Soyoung Park, Vimalraj Mani, Kijong Lee, Sang Un Park, Ye Jin Kim, Jae Kwang Kim
    Journal of Food Composition and Analysis.2025; 145: 107779.     CrossRef

Download Citation

Download a citation file in RIS format that can be imported by all major citation management software, including EndNote, ProCite, RefWorks, and Reference Manager.

Format:

Include:

Lodging-Tolerant, High Yield, Mechanized-Harvest Adaptable and Small Seed Soybean Cultivar ‘Aram’ for Soy-sprout
Korean. J. Breed. Sci.. 2019;51(3):214-221.   Published online September 1, 2019
Download Citation

Download a citation file in RIS format that can be imported by all major citation management software, including EndNote, ProCite, RefWorks, and Reference Manager.

Format:
Include:
Lodging-Tolerant, High Yield, Mechanized-Harvest Adaptable and Small Seed Soybean Cultivar ‘Aram’ for Soy-sprout
Korean. J. Breed. Sci.. 2019;51(3):214-221.   Published online September 1, 2019
Close

Figure

  • 0
  • 1
Lodging-Tolerant, High Yield, Mechanized-Harvest Adaptable and Small Seed Soybean Cultivar ‘Aram’ for Soy-sprout
Image Image
Fig. 1 Genealogy of ‘Aram’.
Fig. 2 Pedigree diagram of ‘Aram’. zPreliminary yield trial, yAdvanced yield trial, xRegional yield trial.
Lodging-Tolerant, High Yield, Mechanized-Harvest Adaptable and Small Seed Soybean Cultivar ‘Aram’ for Soy-sprout

Morphological characteristics of ‘Aram’

Cultivar Growth habit Leaflet shape Flower Color Pubescence Color Pod Color Seed coat color Hilum color Seed shape
Aram Determinate Ovate Purple Grey Yellow Yellow Light brown Spherical
Pungsannamulkong Determinate Lanceolate Purple Grey Yellow Yellow Yellow Spherical

Quantitative characteristics of ‘Aram’ determined by regional yield trial in four regions from 2014 to 2016

Cultivar Flowering Date (Month, Day) Maturity Date (Month. Day) Plant Height (cm) First Pod Height (cm) No. of nods No. of branches No. of pods Seed Uniformity (%)z 100-seed weight (g) Lodging at field (1-9)y Shattering


Normal culture Density culture Field (1-9)x Ratio by Oven test (%)
Aram 8.5 10.15 65 13 16 4.5 99 82 9.9 1 3 1 8.1
Pungsannamulkong 8.4 10.8 54 11 15 4.4 99 49 10.9 5 8 1 39.6

t-valuew - - 3.02** 0.95ns 0.50ns 1.61ns -0.07ns 3.84ns -6.11** - - - -

zRatio of 4.0-5.6 mm seed weight to total seed weight (’16, Dalseong)

y(1) Tolerant ~ (9) Susceptible

x(1) No shattering ~ (9) Easy to shattering

w(ns) non-significant; * and ** were significantly different between Aram and Pungsannamulkong at 0.05 and 0.01 level of probability, respectively, by student t-test.

The resistance of ‘Aram’ to the soybean diseases estimated from 2014 to 2016

Cultivar Bacterial Pustule (0-9)z Root rot (%)y Soybean Mosaic Virusx Percentages of damaged seed (%)y



Field Inoculation Inoculation Field (0-9)z Purple seed stain Seed mottling Phomopsis seed decay Pod borer damage

G5 G6H G7H
Aram 0 3 0.0 L/M L/M L/M 0 0.3 0.2 0.5 4.3
Pungsannamulkong 1 3 1.1 L/M L/M L/M 1 0.2 1.4 0.1 4.7

z(0)Tolerant~(9)Susceptible

yRoot rot and damaged seed that were naturally infected in the field were estimated

xInoculated leaf / upper leaves, (-) No symptom, (L) Local reaction, (M) Mosaic

Major component of seed in ‘Aram’ estimated from 2014 to 2016

Cultivar Crude Protein (%) Crude Oil (%) Fatty acids (%) Isoflavone (μg/g)


Saturated Unsaturated Daidzein Glycitein Genistein Total
Aram 40.9 18.5 15.8 84.2 1,013 499 1,731 3,243
Pungsannamulkong 41.6 17.6 15.2 84.8 682 196 937 1,815

t-valuez -0.40ns 2.51ns 0.94ns -0.94ns 2.20ns 10.16** 3.55* 3.92*

zns non-significant, * and ** were significantly different between Aram and Pungsannamulkong at 0.05 and 0.01 level of probability by student t-test, respectively.

Characteristics of sprouts of ‘Aram’ estimated from 2014 to 2016

Cultivar 2-day Germination Rate (%) 5-day Germination Rate (%) Whole length (cm) Hypocotyl length (cm) Root length (cm) Hypocotyl thickness (mm) Hard seed rate (%) Decayed seed rate (%) Soy-sprout yield (%)
Aram 93 96 20.3 9.1 11.2 1.9 0.0 1.0 598
Pungsannamulkong 91 94 20.4 9.5 10.8 2.1 0.8 0.0 598

t-valuez 2.83ns 2.14ns 0.13ns -0.17ns 0.65ns -2.0ns -4.00ns 1ns 0.02ns

zns is not significantly different between Aram and Pungsannamulkong at 0.05 by student t-test

The result of yield trials carried from 2012 to 2013 in Milyang

Cultivar Yield (ton ha-1) Indexx

PYT (’12)z AYT (’13)y Mean
Aram 3.98 4.59 4.29 129
Pungsannamulkong 2.79 3.86 3.33 100

z(PYT) Preliminary yield trial,

y(AYT) Advanced yield trial,

x(Index) Mean yield of Aram/mean yield of Pungsannamulkong × 100

The result of regional yield trials carried from 2014 to 2016 in four regions

Yield (Ton ha-1)

Location Aram Pungsannamulkong


2014 2015 2016 Mean Indexz 2014 2015 2016 Mean
Suwon 3.82 2.81 3.93 3.52 107 3.51 2.29 4.07 3.29
Naju 4.17 4.83 3.04 4.01 113 2.88 4.49 3.28 3.55
Dalseong 3.37 3.65 3.74 3.59 106 2.71 3.45 4.04 3.40
Jeju 3.16 2.61 3.78 3.18 120 2.36 2.40 3.21 2.66


Overall mean 3.63 3.48 3.62 3.58 111 2.87 3.16 3.65 3.22


t-valuey - - - 2.1* - - - - -

z(Index) Mean yield of Aram / mean yield of Pungsannamulkong × 100.

y* was significantly different between Aram and Pungsannamulkong at 0.05 by student t-test.

Table 1 Morphological characteristics of ‘Aram’
Table 2 Quantitative characteristics of ‘Aram’ determined by regional yield trial in four regions from 2014 to 2016

Ratio of 4.0-5.6 mm seed weight to total seed weight (’16, Dalseong)

(1) Tolerant ~ (9) Susceptible

(1) No shattering ~ (9) Easy to shattering

(ns) non-significant; * and ** were significantly different between Aram and Pungsannamulkong at 0.05 and 0.01 level of probability, respectively, by student t-test.

Table 3 The resistance of ‘Aram’ to the soybean diseases estimated from 2014 to 2016

(0)Tolerant~(9)Susceptible

Root rot and damaged seed that were naturally infected in the field were estimated

Inoculated leaf / upper leaves, (-) No symptom, (L) Local reaction, (M) Mosaic

Table 4 Major component of seed in ‘Aram’ estimated from 2014 to 2016

ns non-significant, * and ** were significantly different between Aram and Pungsannamulkong at 0.05 and 0.01 level of probability by student t-test, respectively.

Table 5 Characteristics of sprouts of ‘Aram’ estimated from 2014 to 2016

ns is not significantly different between Aram and Pungsannamulkong at 0.05 by student t-test

Table 6 The result of yield trials carried from 2012 to 2013 in Milyang

(PYT) Preliminary yield trial,

(AYT) Advanced yield trial,

(Index) Mean yield of Aram/mean yield of Pungsannamulkong × 100

Table 7 The result of regional yield trials carried from 2014 to 2016 in four regions

(Index) Mean yield of Aram / mean yield of Pungsannamulkong × 100.

* was significantly different between Aram and Pungsannamulkong at 0.05 by student t-test.