Skip to main navigation Skip to main content

Korean. J. Breed. Sci. : Korean Journal of Breeding Science

OPEN ACCESS
ABOUT
BROWSE ARTICLES
EDITORIAL POLICIES
FOR CONTRIBUTORS

Articles

Article

직립 초형 중생 찰기장 “금실찰”

고지연1,*, 송석보1, 최명은1, 곽도연1, 최지명1, 우관식1, 윤건식2, 최규환3, 김용순4

Erect Plant Type and Medium Maturing Proso millet (Panicum miliaceum L.) Variety ‘Geumsilchal’

Korean Journal of Breeding Science 2018;50(3):296-301.
Published online: August 31, 2018

농촌진흥청 국립식량과학원

충청북도농업기술원

전라북도농업기술원

전라남도농업기술원

National Institute Crop Science, RDA, 50424, Korea

Chungchungbukdo Agricultural Research and Extension Services, 28130, Korea

Jellabukdo Agricultural Research and Extension Services, 54591, Korea

Jellanamdo Agricultural Research and Extension Services, 58213, Korea

(E-mail: kjeeyeon@korea.kr, Tel: +82-55-350-1225, Fax: +82-55-352-3059)
• Received: May 16, 2018   • Accepted: June 8, 2018

Copyright: © 2018 by the Korean Society of Breeding Science

This is an Open-Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

  • 99 Views
  • 0 Download
  • 2 Crossref
prev next

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  Crossref logo
  • ‘Yeonheechal’: A Soft, Large, White, and Glutinous Proso Millet Variety (Panicum miliaceum L.)
    Ji Ho Chu, Ji Yeon Ko, Seok Bo Song, Myeong Eun Choi, Sang Ik Han, Do Yeon Kwak
    Korean Journal of Breeding Science.2023; 55(4): 409.     CrossRef
  • A High-Yielding and Medium Maturing Proso Millet (Panicum miliaceum L.) Variety ‘Cheongpungchal’
    Geon-Sig Yun, Jae-Wung Lee, Se-Gu Hwang, Ik-Jei Kim, Seong-Taeg Hong, Jee-Yeon Ko, Gyu-Hwan Choi, Yong-Soon Kim, Hong-Sig Kim
    Korean Journal of Breeding Science.2019; 51(1): 55.     CrossRef

Download Citation

Download a citation file in RIS format that can be imported by all major citation management software, including EndNote, ProCite, RefWorks, and Reference Manager.

Format:

Include:

Erect Plant Type and Medium Maturing Proso millet (Panicum miliaceum L.) Variety ‘Geumsilchal’
Korean. J. Breed. Sci.. 2018;50(3):296-301.   Published online September 1, 2018
Download Citation

Download a citation file in RIS format that can be imported by all major citation management software, including EndNote, ProCite, RefWorks, and Reference Manager.

Format:
Include:
Erect Plant Type and Medium Maturing Proso millet (Panicum miliaceum L.) Variety ‘Geumsilchal’
Korean. J. Breed. Sci.. 2018;50(3):296-301.   Published online September 1, 2018
Close

Figure

  • 0
Erect Plant Type and Medium Maturing Proso millet (Panicum miliaceum L.) Variety ‘Geumsilchal’
Image
Fig. 1 Pedigree diagram of ‘Geumsilchal’.
Erect Plant Type and Medium Maturing Proso millet (Panicum miliaceum L.) Variety ‘Geumsilchal’

Seeding date, heading date and growth period of ‘Geumsilchal’ and ‘Hwanggeumgijang’ in normal and late season

Variety Normal season Late season


Seeding date (mm.dd) Heading date (mm.dd) Growth periodz (days) Seeding date (mm.dd) Heading date (mm.dd) Growth period (days)
Geumsilchal 5.15 7.13 104 6.15 8.3 94
Hwanggeumgijang 5.15 7.4 95 6.15 7.26 86

zGrowth period indicates days from seeding day to maturing day

Leaf, culm and root characteristics of ‘Geumsilchal’ and ‘Hwanggeumgijang’

Variety Leaf Color Anthocyanin in flag leaf Growth habit Culm

Length (cm) Width (mm)
Geumsilchal Green No Erect 123±4.1z,a,y 5.0±0.6
Hwanggeumgijang Green Yes Semi-erect 110±6.5b 4.3±0.5

zValues are mean±SD(n=3).

yThe different letters are significantly different between varieties at the 5% probability level by DMRT.

Panicle and grain characteristics of ‘Geumsilchal’ and ‘Hwanggeumgijang’

Variety Panicle Seed color Dehusked grain color Endosperm

Length(cm) Type
Geumsilchal 28.0±1.5z,a,y Droopy Yellow Yellow Glutinous
Hwanggeumgijang 32.3±2.8b Droopy Brown with white dot Yellow Glutinous

zValues are mean±SD(n=3).

yThe same letters are not significantly different between varieties at the 5% probability level by DMRT.

Reaction to lodging tolerance, and major diseases and insect of ‘Geumsilchal’ and ‘Hwanggeumgijang’

Variety Field lodging (0-9) Damage index by diseases and insecty

Blast Sheath blight Bacterial stripe Pest resistance
Geumsilchal 1z 3 3 1 1
Hwanggeumgijang 3 3 3 1 1

zLodging degree : 1~ 5%, 1; 6~10%, 3; 11~50% 5; 54~75%, 7; over 76%, 9

yDisease and insect degree : symptomless, 0; below 1% of diseased panicle, 1; 1~5%, 3; 6~25%, 5; 26~50%, 7; over 50%, 9

Yield components of ‘Geumsilchal’ and ‘Hwanggeumgijang’

Variety Panicle number per m-2 Panicle weight per hill-1 Ripened grain ratio (%) Weight of 1,000 seeds(g)

Unpolished grain Polished grain
Geumsilchal 39.9±5.11z,a,y 5.8±1.1a 71.2±2.5a 4.68±0.08a 3.79±0.03a
Hwanggeumgijang 35.6±2.43a 5.3±1.9a 72.3±3.1a 5.36±0.12b 4.19±0.05b

zValues are mean±SD (n=3).

yThe same letters are not significantly different between varieties at the 5% probability level by DMRT.

Milling property and functional component of ‘Geumsilchal’ and ‘Hwanggeumgijang’

Variety Variety Brown/rough grian ratio (%) Milled grain recovery (%) Head grain milling yield (%) Protein Contents (%) Polyphenol content (μg/g) Amylose content (%)
Geumsilchal 81.8a,z 76.2a 71.2a 11.2a 694a 8.7a
Hwanggeumgijang 82.6a 76.8a 72.3a 8.7b 617a 7.7a

zThe same letters are not significantly different between varieties at the 5% probability level by DMRT.

Yield performance of ‘Geumsilchal’ and ‘Hwanggeumgijang’ at advanced yield trial(AYT)

Variety Normal season Late season


Yield (Ton/ha) Index Yield (Ton/ha) Index
Geumsilchal 2.00 132 2.07 110
Hwanggeumgijang 1.51 100 1.89 100

Yield performance of ‘Geumsilchal’ and ‘Hwanggeumgijang’ at local adaptability test(LAT)

Variety Milyang Suwon Cheongwon Iksan Naju Mean Index
----------- Unpolished grains, t ha-1 -------
Geumsilchal 2.69 1.82 2.99 1.74 2.78 2.41a,z 1.27
Hwanggeumgijang 1.67 1.28 2.20 1.81 2.54 1.90a 1.00

zThe same letters are not significantly different between varieties at the 5% probability level by DMRT

Table 1 Seeding date, heading date and growth period of ‘Geumsilchal’ and ‘Hwanggeumgijang’ in normal and late season

Growth period indicates days from seeding day to maturing day

Table 2 Leaf, culm and root characteristics of ‘Geumsilchal’ and ‘Hwanggeumgijang’

Values are mean±SD(n=3).

The different letters are significantly different between varieties at the 5% probability level by DMRT.

Table 3 Panicle and grain characteristics of ‘Geumsilchal’ and ‘Hwanggeumgijang’

Values are mean±SD(n=3).

The same letters are not significantly different between varieties at the 5% probability level by DMRT.

Table 4 Reaction to lodging tolerance, and major diseases and insect of ‘Geumsilchal’ and ‘Hwanggeumgijang’

Lodging degree : 1~ 5%, 1; 6~10%, 3; 11~50% 5; 54~75%, 7; over 76%, 9

Disease and insect degree : symptomless, 0; below 1% of diseased panicle, 1; 1~5%, 3; 6~25%, 5; 26~50%, 7; over 50%, 9

Table 5 Yield components of ‘Geumsilchal’ and ‘Hwanggeumgijang’

Values are mean±SD (n=3).

The same letters are not significantly different between varieties at the 5% probability level by DMRT.

Table 6 Milling property and functional component of ‘Geumsilchal’ and ‘Hwanggeumgijang’

The same letters are not significantly different between varieties at the 5% probability level by DMRT.

Table 7 Yield performance of ‘Geumsilchal’ and ‘Hwanggeumgijang’ at advanced yield trial(AYT)
Table 8 Yield performance of ‘Geumsilchal’ and ‘Hwanggeumgijang’ at local adaptability test(LAT)

The same letters are not significantly different between varieties at the 5% probability level by DMRT