1 농촌진흥청 국립식량과학원
1 National Institute of Crop Science (NICS), RDA, Jeonju, 55365, Korea
2 제주도농업기술원
2 Jeju Agricultural Research & Extension Service, Jeju 63556, Korea
3 경상남도농업기술원
3
Gyeongsangnam-do Agricultural Research & Extension Service, Jinju 52733, Korea JFIF d d Ducky d qhttp://ns.adobe.com/xap/1.0/ |er˭|I|-fGK.rΛp8XV1%K6mvG+tc+qE &ǸC_Nm:l=_/m5^[dߌڇ.c<%:)tQ$Ow~-aY;UJ >=F)2[nk؆?훐 M=l6[4(O.]2#-H^n#->&mp5~Fӛ+|| S,xag% qkEUzUgæBhߕP(7]kFnq?֖Cpru Z6*rEڊtS|*tI*E}7R<,nUU֫^I7Q*mSly%rdȓd8hE<9oHhMfNSRj[i7D[Rj݊+kდq{"$$H?p \̅S?㭻;t~ R߁ )^/>Qj`yt[w ԛ;² ~+ ߔ_ YW~|o] ?x^ᯛ `ʼn;g)T@vWn]>&4l p+$D̢1l|ȨF%-} .9[}w~
ԠLM9hСablfe&QoW !s ?wjLK?s7yO>(=C~_nyǜu? v 3vyo oI@qV-jeES^[9WoSܝh"l2C1a͔CiJ@3:Pճw= /7ovuk+\V;lDgն <[A+r X~d;m!_s8ݖ;;.0llUC+?i#_crʙ1~C.\q u l8Hܶ2m`ܻM3Tov|Bs rɵ"oLS-
DКw=Tv@f '6|YlD͓Y%-#Ѯo%:&!3o%\J<02;K87>^vgƓ# ;ݝmz^Y6=PS39U%~
&f#
}o!muH; ʲŇ˷yvP+&.7e[3'vR4Yj̗IZ`e˽3o[WU{
m[sUbۋZǾۆl6~9'V*.\S2<Sd*zY[aŶ`]C$n.v^Ʌ
dng>ەZ,Mmϑ :n6nϦezW qUJ4! ۇ4R! =>>F n|Q[{pRO 17ƕ~._I ''00k=b՛o}Osðc2'o\3}ݭQ^ 2 . R1yKȣtAݿ-u ܾw!`?1Whn|gzU o[ECWwjUIן)^h#1ɭ!/Z
np;o;ΗŻkXs."6E`Z1
עӐ9Kl8qd q} 2Stt;#j>;խabONŗ=fwP1j)l6J̶|gV 2`y/0E˛6+ԫ1?
6}KW c\KoKͨ2ۅFws*TԞLיuDx .kCzWXhy۶gLu|%TnupǺl-S* P RaLnT+c+*xl.v!.U=|; !_L̎뱚U=4hm:ٯ"y)$:>%(n}X'p[ȴ
^˒4kƓmzDx
\
'Nq amP7nyN݅=
© Korean Society of Breeding Science. All rights reserved.
This is an Open-Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
| Cultivar | Flowering Date (Month, Day) | Maturity Date (Month. Day) | Height (cm) | First Pod Height (cm) | No. of nods | No. of branch | No. of pod | 100-seed weight (g) | Lodging at field (0-9)z | Shattering | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Normal culture | Dense culture | Field (0-9)y | Ratio by Oven test(%) | |||||||||
| Seonpung | 8.5 | 10.19 | 67 | 18 | 16 | 3.0 | 43 | 25.9 | 2 | 4 | 1 | 2.2 |
| Daewon | 7.25 | 10.14 | 70 | 11 | 14 | 3.2 | 46 | 24.2 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 0.0 |
| t-valuex | - | - | 0.60ns | -2.63* | -2.77** | 1.41ns | 0.84ns | -2.97** | - | - | - | - |
| Cultivar | Bacterial Pustule (0-9)z | Root rot (%)y | Soybean Mosaic Virusx | Percentages of damaged seed (%)y | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
| Field | Inoculation | Inoculation | Field(0-9)z | Purple seed stain | Seed spot | Phomopsis | Pod borer | ||||
|
|
|||||||||||
| G5 | G6H | G7H | |||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||
| Seonpung | 1 | 2 | 4.0 | M / - | - / - | - / - | 0 | 0.3 | 0.7 | 0.5 | 2.5 |
|
|
|||||||||||
| Daewon | 3 | 5 | 0.0 | L / M | L / M | L / M | 0 | 0.2 | 0.6 | 0.4 | 3.2 |
| Cultivar | Crude Protein (%) | Crude Oil (%) | Fatty acids (%) | Isoflavone (㎍/g) | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|||||||
| Saturated | Unsaturated | Daidzein | Glycitein | Genistein | Total | |||
|
|
|
|||||||
| Seonpung | 39.0 | 18.7 | 14.9 | 85.1 | 910 | 331 | 1,371 | 2,612 |
|
|
|
|||||||
| Daewon | 38.4 | 18.8 | 13.2 | 86.8 | 786 | 347 | 1,189 | 2,323 |
|
|
|
|||||||
| t-valuez | -0.48ns | 0.24ns | -1.66ns | 1.66ns | -1.23ns | 0.22ns | -1.19ns | -1.19ns |
| Cultivar | Tofu yield (%) | Bean Curd Residue(%) | Color valuez | Physical characteristics | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
||||||||||
| L | a | b | ΔE | Springiness | Gumminess | Cohesiveness | Chewiness | Hardness (g/3.14㎟) | |||
|
|
|
||||||||||
| Seonpung | 241 | 169 | 84 | 0.67 | 17.6 | 1.8 | 0.90 | 1,029 | 0.81 | 939 | 1,258 |
|
|
|
||||||||||
| Daewon | 238 | 162 | 85 | 0.61 | 16.1 | 0.92 | 1,150 | 0.80 | 1,047 | 1,400 | |
|
|
|
||||||||||
| t-valuey | -0.05ns | -0.39ns | - | - | - | - | 0.71ns | 0.26ns | -0.41ns | 0.25ns | 0.27ns |
| Cultivar | Soybean malt | Fermented soybean | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|||||
| Yield (%) | Scent (1-5)z | Degree of fermentation (1-5)z | Yield (%) | Scent (1-5)z | γ-PGA (mg/g) | |
|
|
|
|||||
| Seonpung | 81 | 4 | 5 | 181 | 5 | 31.7 |
|
|
|
|||||
| Daewon | 81 | 4 | 4 | 197 | 4 | 29.2 |
|
|
|
|||||
| t-valuey | - | - | - | 0.78ns | - | -0.29ns |
| Cultivar | Yield (Ton/ha) | Indexx | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
||||
| PYT(‘09)z | AYT(‘10)y | Mean | ||
|
|
||||
| Seonpung | 360 | 297 | 322 | 112 |
|
|
||||
| Daewon | 272 | 297 | 286 | 100 |
|
|
||||
| t-valuew | -0.92ns | 0.01ns | -0.93ns | - |
| Cropping | Location | Seonpung | Daewon | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
||||||||||
| 2011 | 2012 | 2013 | Mean | Indexz | 2011 | 2012 | 2013 | Mean | ||
|
|
||||||||||
| Mono | Suwon | 234 | 294 | 364 | 297 | 123 | 201 | 217 | 310 | 243 |
| Yeoncheon | 290 | 256 | 331 | 292 | 114 | 283 | 198 | 289 | 257 | |
| Chuncheon | 287 | 322 | 333 | 314 | 103 | 287 | 292 | 334 | 304 | |
|
|
||||||||||
| Mean | 270 | 291 | 343 | 301 | 112 | 257 | 236 | 311 | 268 | |
|
|
||||||||||
| Double | Naju | 311 | 277 | 529 | 372 | 120 | 226 | 236 | 469 | 310 |
| Dalseong | - | - | 378 | 378 | 121 | - | - | 313 | 313 | |
| Miryang | 336 | 322 | - | 329 | 111 | 268 | 326 | - | 297 | |
| Yesan | 312 | 193 | 299 | 268 | 139 | 253 | 161 | 164 | 193 | |
| Iksan | 304 | 304 | 310 | 306 | 119 | 240 | 263 | 269 | 257 | |
| Jinju | 383 | 285 | 296 | 321 | 112 | 260 | 290 | 313 | 288 | |
| Cheongwon | 326 | 355 | 432 | 371 | 139 | 237 | 227 | 337 | 267 | |
| Chilgok | 420 | 334 | 442 | 399 | 116 | 327 | 340 | 367 | 345 | |
| Jeju | 323 | 247 | 314 | 295 | 135 | 214 | 151 | 291 | 219 | |
|
|
||||||||||
| Mean | 339 | 290 | 375 | 335 | 123 | 253 | 249 | 315 | 273 | |
|
|
||||||||||
| Overall mean | 321 | 290 | 366 | 326 | 120 | 254 | 246 | 314 | 271 | |
|
|
||||||||||
| Adaptable mean (Double cropping area) | 342 | 296 | 384 | 340 | 121 | 259 | 263 | 319 | 280 | |
|
|
||||||||||
| t-valuey | - | - | - | 2.76** | - | - | - | - | - | |
Qualitative characteristics of ‘Seonpung’.
| Cultivar | Growth habit | Leaflet shape | Flower color | Pubescence Color | Seed coat color | Hilum color | Seed shape |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Seonpung | Determinate | Oval | White | Gray | Yellow | Yellow | Spherical |
| Daewon | Determinate | Oval | White | Gray | Yellow | Yellow | Spherical |
Quantitative characteristics of ‘Seonpung’ determined by regional yield trial from 2011 to 2013.
| Cultivar | Flowering Date (Month, Day) | Maturity Date (Month. Day) | Height (cm) | First Pod Height (cm) | No. of nods | No. of branch | No. of pod | 100-seed weight (g) | Lodging at field (0-9) |
Shattering | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Normal culture | Dense culture | Field (0-9) |
Ratio by Oven test(%) | |||||||||
| Seonpung | 8.5 | 10.19 | 67 | 18 | 16 | 3.0 | 43 | 25.9 | 2 | 4 | 1 | 2.2 |
| Daewon | 7.25 | 10.14 | 70 | 11 | 14 | 3.2 | 46 | 24.2 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 0.0 |
| t-value |
- | - | 0.60 |
-2.63 |
-2.77 |
1.41 |
0.84 |
-2.97 |
- | - | - | - |
z: (0)No lodging ~ (9)Easy to lodging
y: (0)No shattering ~ (9)Easy to shattering
x: (ns)non-significant
* and ** were significantly different between Seonpung and Daewonkong at 0.01 and 0.05 by student t-test.
The resistance of ‘Seonpung’ to the diseases of soybean estimated from 2011 to 2013.
| Cultivar | Bacterial Pustule (0-9) |
Root rot (%) |
Soybean Mosaic Virus |
Percentages of damaged seed (%) |
|||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
| Field | Inoculation | Inoculation | Field(0-9) |
Purple seed stain | Seed spot | Phomopsis | Pod borer | ||||
|
|
|||||||||||
| G5 | G6H | G7H | |||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||
| Seonpung | 1 | 2 | 4.0 | M / - | - / - | - / - | 0 | 0.3 | 0.7 | 0.5 | 2.5 |
|
|
|||||||||||
| Daewon | 3 | 5 | 0.0 | L / M | L / M | L / M | 0 | 0.2 | 0.6 | 0.4 | 3.2 |
z(0)Tolerant~(9)Susceptible
y: Root rot and damaged seed that were naturally infected in the field were estimated
x: Reaction of inoculated leaf/upper leaves, (-)No symptom, (L)Local reaction, (M)Mosaic
Major component of Seed in ‘Seonpung’ estimated from 2011 to 2013.
| Cultivar | Crude Protein (%) | Crude Oil (%) | Fatty acids (%) | Isoflavone (㎍/g) | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|||||||
| Saturated | Unsaturated | Daidzein | Glycitein | Genistein | Total | |||
|
|
|
|||||||
| Seonpung | 39.0 | 18.7 | 14.9 | 85.1 | 910 | 331 | 1,371 | 2,612 |
|
|
|
|||||||
| Daewon | 38.4 | 18.8 | 13.2 | 86.8 | 786 | 347 | 1,189 | 2,323 |
|
|
|
|||||||
| t-value |
-0.48ns | 0.24ns | -1.66ns | 1.66ns | -1.23ns | 0.22ns | -1.19ns | -1.19ns |
z: ns is not significantly different between Seonpung and Daewonkong at 0.05 by student t-test.
Characteristics of tofu of ‘Seonpung’ estimated from 2011 to 2013.
| Cultivar | Tofu yield (%) | Bean Curd Residue(%) | Color value |
Physical characteristics | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
||||||||||
| L | a | b | ΔE | Springiness | Gumminess | Cohesiveness | Chewiness | Hardness (g/3.14㎟) | |||
|
|
|
||||||||||
| Seonpung | 241 | 169 | 84 | 0.67 | 17.6 | 1.8 | 0.90 | 1,029 | 0.81 | 939 | 1,258 |
| |
|
||||||||||
| Daewon | 238 | 162 | 85 | 0.61 | 16.1 | 0.92 | 1,150 | 0.80 | 1,047 | 1,400 | |
| |
|
||||||||||
| t-value |
-0.05ns | -0.39ns | - | - | - | - | 0.71ns | 0.26ns | -0.41ns | 0.25ns | 0.27ns |
z: (L)Lightness, (a)Green~Red, (b)Blue~Yellow, (ΔE)1.5~3.0% : noticeably difference
y: ns is not significantly different between Seonpung and Daewonkong at 0.05 by student t-test
Soybean malt and fermented soybean process-ability by ‘Seonpung’.
| Cultivar | Soybean malt | Fermented soybean | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|||||
| Yield (%) | Scent (1-5) |
Degree of fermentation (1-5) |
Yield (%) | Scent (1-5)z | γ-PGA (mg/g) | |
|
|
|
|||||
| Seonpung | 81 | 4 | 5 | 181 | 5 | 31.7 |
| |
|
|||||
| Daewon | 81 | 4 | 4 | 197 | 4 | 29.2 |
| |
|
|||||
| t-value |
- | - | - | 0.78ns | - | -0.29ns |
z: (1)Worst, (2)Bad, (3)Fair, (4)Good, (5)Best
y: ns is not significantly different between Seonpung and Daewonkong at 0.05 by student t-test
Yield of ‘Seonpung’ on yield trials carried out at Milyang.
| Cultivar | Yield (Ton/ha) | Index |
||
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
||||
| PYT(‘09) |
AYT(‘10) |
Mean | ||
|
|
||||
| Seonpung | 360 | 297 | 322 | 112 |
| |
||||
| Daewon | 272 | 297 | 286 | 100 |
| |
||||
| t-value |
-0.92ns | 0.01ns | -0.93ns | - |
z: (PYT)Preliminary yield trial
y: (AYT)Advanced yield trial
x: (Index)Mean yield of cultivar/mean yield of Daewonkong 100
w: ns is not significantly different between Seonpung and Daewonkong at 0.05 by student t-test
Yield of ‘Seonpung’ on the regional yield trials carried out at 12 locations.
| Cropping | Location | Seonpung | Daewon | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
||||||||||
| 2011 | 2012 | 2013 | Mean | Index |
2011 | 2012 | 2013 | Mean | ||
|
|
||||||||||
| Mono | Suwon | 234 | 294 | 364 | 297 | 123 | 201 | 217 | 310 | 243 |
| Yeoncheon | 290 | 256 | 331 | 292 | 114 | 283 | 198 | 289 | 257 | |
| Chuncheon | 287 | 322 | 333 | 314 | 103 | 287 | 292 | 334 | 304 | |
|
|
||||||||||
| Mean | 270 | 291 | 343 | 301 | 112 | 257 | 236 | 311 | 268 | |
| |
||||||||||
| Double | Naju | 311 | 277 | 529 | 372 | 120 | 226 | 236 | 469 | 310 |
| Dalseong | - | - | 378 | 378 | 121 | - | - | 313 | 313 | |
| Miryang | 336 | 322 | - | 329 | 111 | 268 | 326 | - | 297 | |
| Yesan | 312 | 193 | 299 | 268 | 139 | 253 | 161 | 164 | 193 | |
| Iksan | 304 | 304 | 310 | 306 | 119 | 240 | 263 | 269 | 257 | |
| Jinju | 383 | 285 | 296 | 321 | 112 | 260 | 290 | 313 | 288 | |
| Cheongwon | 326 | 355 | 432 | 371 | 139 | 237 | 227 | 337 | 267 | |
| Chilgok | 420 | 334 | 442 | 399 | 116 | 327 | 340 | 367 | 345 | |
| Jeju | 323 | 247 | 314 | 295 | 135 | 214 | 151 | 291 | 219 | |
| |
||||||||||
| Mean | 339 | 290 | 375 | 335 | 123 | 253 | 249 | 315 | 273 | |
| |
||||||||||
| Overall mean | 321 | 290 | 366 | 326 | 120 | 254 | 246 | 314 | 271 | |
| |
||||||||||
| Adaptable mean (Double cropping area) | 342 | 296 | 384 | 340 | 121 | 259 | 263 | 319 | 280 | |
|
|
||||||||||
|
t-value |
- | - | - | 2.76** | - | - | - | - | - | |
z: (Index) Mean yield of Seonpung / mean yield of Daewonkong × 100
y: ** was significantly different between Seonpung and Daewonkong at 0.01 by student t-test.
: (0)No lodging ~ (9)Easy to lodging
: (0)No shattering ~ (9)Easy to shattering
: (ns)non-significant
* and ** were significantly different between Seonpung and Daewonkong at 0.01 and 0.05 by student t-test.
(0)Tolerant~(9)Susceptible
: Root rot and damaged seed that were naturally infected in the field were estimated
: Reaction of inoculated leaf/upper leaves, (-)No symptom, (L)Local reaction, (M)Mosaic
: ns is not significantly different between Seonpung and Daewonkong at 0.05 by student t-test.
: (L)Lightness, (a)Green~Red, (b)Blue~Yellow, (ΔE)1.5~3.0% : noticeably difference
: ns is not significantly different between Seonpung and Daewonkong at 0.05 by student t-test
: (1)Worst, (2)Bad, (3)Fair, (4)Good, (5)Best
: ns is not significantly different between Seonpung and Daewonkong at 0.05 by student t-test
: (PYT)Preliminary yield trial
: (AYT)Advanced yield trial
: (Index)Mean yield of cultivar/mean yield of Daewonkong 100
: ns is not significantly different between Seonpung and Daewonkong at 0.05 by student t-test
: (Index) Mean yield of Seonpung / mean yield of Daewonkong × 100
: ** was significantly different between Seonpung and Daewonkong at 0.01 by student t-test.
